home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1074 / 1074r059.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  73KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | reckoner | sky
OCR: general account contract. and leaves regulation ex elusively to the States That argument was correctly rejected the district court. Pet. App. A27-35 ERISA both iT general and in the guaranteed benefit policy provision in particular, Dortotstt and specifically relates to the business insurance Moreover, dual regulation under ERISA state law is not an im possibility. Many requirements are com plementary, and in the ease direct conflict, federal suptemacy prin- ciples require state tat yield. Pet App. A29 31 U.S 26 n.13 Hancock' argument was also rejected bv the Hmo and was not raised by Hancock before the Second Circuit. Harris P.A. 26. 35 the Extent tfrat State Insurance Laws Conflict with ERISA, They Are Preempted The Statutory Scheme ERISA contains prE emption provision: Except as provide ...